| Analysis: How vital is a wine qualification? |
| Written by Gemma McKenna |
| Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:04 |
|
Insider: Harpers Wine & Spirit magazine has been looking at how vital a wine qualification is in the drinks trade. While wine professionals still see it as essential, the blogging community has different views. How do you get a foot on the ladder in the wine trade? “If you’re looking for new staff to have a WSET Certificate or Diploma already, then you’re fishing in a very small pond,” says Bibendum managing director Michael Saunders.
This sentiment is echoed by Giles Cooke MW, marketing and buying director at Alliance Wine, who says it’s more important to find someone with the right attitude. “We value attitude over knowledge. You can have too much knowledge and not know how to apply it in sales roles. People have had issues with not being able to listen to the customer,” he adds.
But aside from WSET courses, those with a thirst for knowledge are also considering Wine MBAs and the Academy of Food & Wine Service Skills.
Nick Scade, chairman of the AFW, says: “We have seen a huge growth in the past few years for front-of-house training. As customer knowledge and interest in wine grows, it’s important that staff, whether in a gastropub, chain restaurant or a fine dining establishment, can talk knowledgeably about the wines on their list, including provenance, method of production, taste and the food it is best matched with.”
The academy offers an entry to wine knowledge course for food waiters, along with two jointly badged qualifications with the WSET – Introductory Certificate Level 2 and a Certified Sommelier Level 3. It can also link into the Court of Master Sommelier courses.
Last year, 27,500 people worldwide completed a WSET course, 9% up on the previous year. About 35% of those courses were held in the UK and 80% of students already worked in the industry.
The not-for-profit organisation now operates in 55 countries and offers companies bespoke courses. “Our syllabus is global,” adds Harris. “It’s the same exam in London and Hong Kong, but we can tailor it to different companies. For example, we can upweight the Australia teaching for a firm focused on Australian wines. But the exam will remain the same.
“We’ve also added a module on basic selling skills, which each company can have tailored to suit them.”
Individuals can then choose whether they want to pursue MWs, MBAs or other further education.
Richard Hitchcock, marketing and operations director at Bottle Green, says training is “fundamental” and “covers product as well as business skills; neither alone is good enough”. All its employees either have or are studying for the WSET Intermediate qualification. “Many then have the WSET Advanced on top and a smaller number have the WSET Diploma. Of course, we also have one MW – David Gill.”
Meanwhile, Tesco head of BWS Dan Jago says: “The authority that the MW title conveys is recognised and valued by customers.”
“I personally never finished my WSET Diploma, but I don’t think that’s made a big difference to my life, other than missing out on contacts.
“The WSET tells you there is no right tasting note for a wine, but when you’re examined on a Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc, if you don’t tick the box “gooseberry” and instead write “it’s like being slapped in the face with a bunch of grass”, you won’t get the marks.
“I’m not trying to do down the WSET, I’d definitely recommend it to people. But if a blogger asks me if they need to do it before they start blogging I’d say no, do it your own way first. If they want to get into some more technical stuff later, then by all means.” |




Comments
As a blogger I am obviously biased.
My opinion is that qualifications can be useful but not just for their own sake and not if they are seen as the be all and end all.
Yo can have all the diplomas you want and still not be able to produce results in the job. So qualities other than a certificate/diploma are needed ( and are arguably more important) according to what branch of the (any) profession you wish to enter
My view is the drive for qualifiactions reflects a widespread wish for uniformity and standardisation ( across all aspects of society) which I personally deplore
If the reliance on a qualification promotes too uniform a way of communicating about any given topic then there is a risk that the 'breath of fresh air' which is often needed, cannot find expression
I know a lady who has a rare condition that means her senses overlap. She can and does DRAW tastes. How would this be received I wonder in an exam? Yet for a limited number of wine lovers her methods are far more relevant that conventional wine vocabulary
However, most wine jobs do not need any wine "credential." You can start at the bottom in any aspect of the wine trade and learn wine "knowledge" on the job or on your own ouside of work.
If you want to be a published wine writer, you will be well served with a bachelor's degree in english where you practice style, how to research, grammar, how to interview, etc.
If you want to be on the finacial side of a company dealing with wine, an MBA is better than a wine credential.
If you want to be a brand manager, a Marketing degree is more essential than a wine "credential."
If you want to be a winemaker you can also learn your way up on the job or get a degree in oenology, but the wine "credential" is not essential.
90% of wine jobs involve selling so more essential than a wine "credential," most of the time, is personality and a Dale Carnegie sales seminar, people skills, etc.
The time that a wine credntial is most needed is when you want to teach wine.
Rick Schofield, CWE
Port Ewen, NY
Cheers!
Dave
I agree that having a qualification is tangential in many places; the US in particular or perhaps France, even. But the evidence I see when I look at various wine blogging sites indicates that a little "qualified education" may not be a bad idea for many. Blogs such as Robert's, Vinography.com and some others show very solid judgement and use well-understood language.
But just because you have an opinion about wine (we all do!)doesn't mean you have anything meaningful to contribute to the discussion. Or,that your ability to communicate shows more precision than someone who has undertaken a qualification that teaches them to not only think critically, but express themselves in a consistent and coherent manner.
IF you live in a place where having a qualification matters avocationally, it behooves you to do it for further advancement. In a tangential environment, qualifications may not be critical,but going through some type of organized program or structured perspective so that you can at least speak with a consistent and measured "voice" seems vital.
Joel